REGULATORYDSA co-chair backs abolishing Senate, ICE and borders as Democratic infighting deepensJul 26, 2026
DEALSPCSIX declares $0.0502 monthly cash dividend, payment set for July 23Jul 26, 2026
DEALSCognition pays low nine figures for Poke to give Devin a personality layerJul 26, 2026
CRYPTOSberbank sets December 1 deadline for cryptocurrency trading infrastructureJul 26, 2026
$BTCDormant BTC movement hits four-year low as long-term holder selling slows, Galaxy reportsJul 26, 2026
MARKETS10 to 15 work years left: dotcom-era scars are reshaping Gen X retirement portfoliosJul 26, 2026
TECHLabour's shrinking share of GDP signals a wider wage-productivity gap aheadJul 26, 2026
DEALSSix platforms, one format: vertical video collapses distinct digital lanesJul 26, 2026
REGULATORYDSA co-chair backs abolishing Senate, ICE and borders as Democratic infighting deepensJul 26, 2026
DEALSPCSIX declares $0.0502 monthly cash dividend, payment set for July 23Jul 26, 2026
DEALSCognition pays low nine figures for Poke to give Devin a personality layerJul 26, 2026
CRYPTOSberbank sets December 1 deadline for cryptocurrency trading infrastructureJul 26, 2026
$BTCDormant BTC movement hits four-year low as long-term holder selling slows, Galaxy reportsJul 26, 2026
MARKETS10 to 15 work years left: dotcom-era scars are reshaping Gen X retirement portfoliosJul 26, 2026
TECHLabour's shrinking share of GDP signals a wider wage-productivity gap aheadJul 26, 2026
DEALSSix platforms, one format: vertical video collapses distinct digital lanesJul 26, 2026

U.S. Justice Department Moves to Block Evanston's $20 Million Race-Based Housing Program

The U.S. Department of Justice filed to intervene this week in a class-action lawsuit targeting Evanston, Illinois's reparations initiative, contending that the program's $25,000 race-based housing grants violate the Fourteenth Amendment's…

By Priya Nair·Jun 29, 2026·2 min read·macro

The U.S. Department of Justice filed to intervene this week in a class-action lawsuit targeting Evanston, Illinois's reparations initiative, contending that the program's $25,000 race-based housing grants violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause and the Fair Housing Act. The city has disbursed more than $7 million of its $20 million fund to date. The DOJ's request to formally join the litigation remains pending before the court.

Program Structure and Disbursements

Evanston approved the Local Reparations Restorative Housing Program in 2019 and launched it in 2021, making it the first municipal reparations program of its kind in the United States. The $20 million fund draws revenue from a local tax on legal recreational marijuana sales. Grants of $25,000 per recipient can be applied toward home purchases, mortgage assistance, property repairs, or taken as direct cash payments. Earlier this year, the city's Reparations Committee approved an additional wave, issuing $25,000 payments to 44 more residents.

To qualify, applicants must be Black and have resided in Evanston as adults between 1919 and 1969, or be a direct descendant of a resident from that era — a period the city documents as marked by systemic housing discrimination and redlining.

DOJ's Constitutional Argument

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the DOJ's Civil Rights Division stated that the program cannot survive strict scrutiny because it uses race as the sole qualifying criterion and does not require applicants to demonstrate personal, traceable financial or physical harm from specific government action. The DOJ's proposed complaint characterizes the distributions as a "wealth transfer" rather than a narrowly tailored remedy for documented individual harm.

The underlying class-action was filed in May 2024 by Judicial Watch on behalf of six non-Black descendants of Evanston residents who argued they were unconstitutionally excluded. In March, U.S. District Judge John F. Kness denied Evanston's motion to dismiss, allowing the lawsuit to proceed. That same month, the DOJ opened a separate civil rights investigation into the city's practices.

Evanston responded with a brief statement maintaining that the program is legal, declining to comment further given active litigation.

Federal Scope Beyond Evanston

Dhillon indicated the DOJ's scrutiny extends to other jurisdictions. The department sent a letter to Buncombe County, North Carolina in September, warning of potential investigation and action if the county approves recommendations from the Asheville-Buncombe Community Reparations Commission. Dhillon noted differences among local programs but said the DOJ would continue identifying and reviewing additional initiatives. Illinois separately has been considering a statewide reparations measure.

Share
Source: NewsMeter
© 2026 NewsMeter

Key takeaways

Frequently asked

Why is the DOJ trying to block Evanston's reparations program?

The DOJ contends the program's race-based $25,000 housing grants violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause and the Fair Housing Act because race is the sole qualifying criterion and recipients need not prove personal, traceable harm.

How is Evanston's $20 million reparations fund financed?

The fund draws its revenue from a local tax on legal recreational marijuana sales.

Who can qualify for the $25,000 grants?

Applicants must be Black and have resided in Evanston as adults between 1919 and 1969, or be a direct descendant of a resident from that period.

What is the status of the lawsuit against Evanston?

The class-action, filed in May 2024 by Judicial Watch on behalf of six non-Black descendants, was allowed to proceed in March when Judge John F. Kness denied Evanston's motion to dismiss; the DOJ's request to intervene remains pending.

Is the DOJ targeting reparations programs beyond Evanston?

Yes; the DOJ sent a warning letter to Buncombe County, North Carolina in September and said it would continue identifying and reviewing additional local reparations initiatives.