$ETHBitmine adds nearly 10,000 ETH to treasury, cumulative buybacks hit 11.6 million shares under $4 billion programJul 28, 2026
MACROSK Hynix shares deepen slide to 12% as selling pressure holdsJul 28, 2026
MACROSingapore birth rate hits post-independence lowJul 28, 2026
EARNINGSAI bond stress widens as Meta, Microsoft earnings approachJul 28, 2026
MACRONasdaq futures fall 0.5%, S&P 500 futures slip in pre-market tradeJul 28, 2026
ENERGYOver 1,000 Iran sanctions in place; Treasury pressure rated above bombs by U.S. officialsJul 28, 2026
ENERGY70% of U.S. voters oppose local data centers, Fox News poll findsJul 27, 2026
CRYPTOCross River to supply the banking layer for X Money's payments and deposit productsJul 27, 2026
$ETHBitmine adds nearly 10,000 ETH to treasury, cumulative buybacks hit 11.6 million shares under $4 billion programJul 28, 2026
MACROSK Hynix shares deepen slide to 12% as selling pressure holdsJul 28, 2026
MACROSingapore birth rate hits post-independence lowJul 28, 2026
EARNINGSAI bond stress widens as Meta, Microsoft earnings approachJul 28, 2026
MACRONasdaq futures fall 0.5%, S&P 500 futures slip in pre-market tradeJul 28, 2026
ENERGYOver 1,000 Iran sanctions in place; Treasury pressure rated above bombs by U.S. officialsJul 28, 2026
ENERGY70% of U.S. voters oppose local data centers, Fox News poll findsJul 27, 2026
CRYPTOCross River to supply the banking layer for X Money's payments and deposit productsJul 27, 2026

Senate Clarity Act revision would impose the first federal ban on officials issuing digital assets

The first federal restriction on government officeholders sponsoring or issuing cryptocurrency would come from a revised Clarity Act now circulating in the Senate. The bill explicitly names sitting presidents among the covered class. No…

By Ines Ferreira·Jul 22, 2026·1 min read·markets

The first federal restriction on government officeholders sponsoring or issuing cryptocurrency would come from a revised Clarity Act now circulating in the Senate. The bill explicitly names sitting presidents among the covered class. No prior crypto statute has addressed federal officials at that level.

What the bill covers

The revised Clarity Act targets two acts: sponsoring and issuing digital assets. Federal officials fall within scope, with the presidency called out by name. That this is described as a new version of the Clarity Act means the restriction is a fresh addition to the legislative text, not language carried over from earlier drafts.

The presidency receives explicit mention. A sitting head of state can extend market credibility to a digital asset in ways most participants cannot, and the bill would make that act a federal violation for the first time.

The gap it closes

No current federal law prevents a sitting president or other officeholder from creating or promoting a cryptocurrency. The Clarity Act revision would be the first statute to draw that line. Whether the prohibition extends beyond the presidency to other classes of federal officials is not specified in the available source summary.

What the bill leaves open

The source does not detail what qualifies as "sponsoring" a digital asset under the bill or what penalties apply. Whether the Senate moves the revised Clarity Act to a floor vote is not yet reported. Both the definitional scope and the legislative calendar remain open questions for any fund or issuer tracking federal-official exposure in digital asset markets. The revised Clarity Act carries no equivalent in existing law.

Related reading

Share
Source: NewsMeter
© 2026 NewsMeter

Key takeaways

Frequently asked

What two acts does the revised Clarity Act target?

It targets sponsoring and issuing digital assets by federal officials.

Why does the bill single out the presidency?

A sitting head of state can extend market credibility to a digital asset in ways most participants cannot, and the bill would make that act a federal violation for the first time.

Does any current federal law already ban officials from issuing crypto?

No; no current federal law prevents a sitting president or other officeholder from creating or promoting a cryptocurrency, and the revised Clarity Act would be the first statute to draw that line.

Does the bill apply to federal officials other than the president?

Whether the prohibition extends beyond the presidency to other classes of federal officials is not specified in the available source summary.

Will the Senate vote on the revised Clarity Act?

It is not yet reported whether the Senate will move the revised Clarity Act to a floor vote.