WORLDFauci invokes Fifth Amendment 111 times as Paul sets contempt voteJul 29, 2026
NVDAKOSPI falls 6% on SK Hynix selloff as Nvidia retreats and Hims & Hers sinks 11.4%Jul 29, 2026
MACROFed holds rates steady: what it means for credit cards, savings accounts, mortgages, and auto loansJul 29, 2026
DEALSJPY 72.0 per share: TKYMF sets semi-annual cash dividend, ex-date March 31, 2027Jul 29, 2026
EARNINGSProcter & Gamble revenue misses Wall Street estimates as earnings per share beatsJul 29, 2026
CRYPTOCost to insure AI debt hits record as Seoul semiconductors crashJul 29, 2026
REGULATORYNovo Nordisk faces shareholder lawsuit over CagriSema tolerability claimsJul 29, 2026
DEALSGrant Thornton's $5bn all-cash CBIZ acquisition is the accounting sector's biggest deal in a generationJul 29, 2026
WORLDFauci invokes Fifth Amendment 111 times as Paul sets contempt voteJul 29, 2026
NVDAKOSPI falls 6% on SK Hynix selloff as Nvidia retreats and Hims & Hers sinks 11.4%Jul 29, 2026
MACROFed holds rates steady: what it means for credit cards, savings accounts, mortgages, and auto loansJul 29, 2026
DEALSJPY 72.0 per share: TKYMF sets semi-annual cash dividend, ex-date March 31, 2027Jul 29, 2026
EARNINGSProcter & Gamble revenue misses Wall Street estimates as earnings per share beatsJul 29, 2026
CRYPTOCost to insure AI debt hits record as Seoul semiconductors crashJul 29, 2026
REGULATORYNovo Nordisk faces shareholder lawsuit over CagriSema tolerability claimsJul 29, 2026
DEALSGrant Thornton's $5bn all-cash CBIZ acquisition is the accounting sector's biggest deal in a generationJul 29, 2026

Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment 111 times as Paul sets contempt vote

111 is the number of times Anthony Fauci repeated the phrase "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution" at a Senate hearing chaired by Sen. Rand Paul,…

By Mateo Fuentes·Jul 29, 2026·2 min read·world

Key takeaways

  • Anthony Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment right 111 times at a Senate hearing chaired by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., providing no substantive answers to any lawmaker.
  • Fauci said his blanket refusal was based on advice of counsel, citing Paul's public calls for his imprisonment and the release of his diary as attempts to get him to say something usable against him.
  • Paul announced a committee contempt vote for the following week after Fauci's 111th invocation.
  • Paul ordered security to remove Fauci's attorney, David Schertler, after ruling he was not recognized by the committee, despite Ranking Democrat Sen. Gary Peters pushing for him to be heard.
  • Paul raised a separate legal question of whether Biden's pardon grants Fauci complete immunity from prosecution, saying courts may need to resolve it.

111 is the number of times Anthony Fauci repeated the phrase "On the advice of counsel, I respectfully decline to answer based upon my rights under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution" at a Senate hearing chaired by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. No question from any lawmaker on either side of the aisle received a substantive answer. Paul announced a committee contempt vote for next week before the session ended.

Fifth Amendment wall

Before the hearing, Paul's staff was confident Fauci would not invoke the Fifth Amendment. A source familiar with the matter told Fox News Digital that committee members were told to come prepared with questions. Paul had also released more than 1,000 pages of Fauci's unredacted diary online ahead of the session.

That confidence proved misplaced. Fauci's stated reason for blanket refusal: Paul's public calls for his imprisonment, combined with the diary release, were designed to get him to say something that could be used against him. Fauci acknowledged it pains him to invoke the Fifth given his decades-long record of cooperating with Congress, but did so on advice of counsel.

Lawyer removed from the room

Tension arrived early. Fauci's attorney, David Schertler, spoke up to remind Paul that the Fifth Amendment is a constitutional right. Paul, as committee chair, ruled Schertler was not recognized by the committee and directed security to remove him. Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich., the ranking Democrat on the panel, pushed for Schertler to be heard. Paul declined.

Schertler previously represented former Sen. Bob Menendez, who was sentenced for accepting gold bars and bribes in exchange for using his influence to benefit the Egyptian government. Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, cited that history on the record before telling Fauci directly that his pandemic-era influence over policy was the reason Moreno ran for the Senate.

Contempt vote and the pardon question

Paul announced the contempt vote after Fauci's 111th invocation. He also flagged a separate legal question: whether Biden's pardon grants Fauci complete immunity from prosecution, a matter Paul said courts may need to resolve. Paul's opening statement had accused Fauci and the National Institutes of Health of funding gain-of-function research for years and misleading Congress, with alleged record destruction adding to what Paul called a fracture in public trust. "Trust can't be ordered," Paul said. "It has to be earned."

Share
Source: foxnews.com
© 2026 NewsMeter

Frequently asked

Why did Fauci invoke the Fifth Amendment?

Fauci said, on advice of counsel, that Paul's public calls for his imprisonment combined with the release of his diary were designed to get him to say something that could be used against him. He acknowledged it pained him to do so given his decades-long record of cooperating with Congress.

What happened to Fauci's lawyer at the hearing?

Fauci's attorney, David Schertler, spoke up to remind Paul that the Fifth Amendment is a constitutional right, but Paul ruled he was not recognized by the committee and directed security to remove him.

What did Paul accuse Fauci and the NIH of in his opening statement?

Paul accused Fauci and the National Institutes of Health of funding gain-of-function research for years and misleading Congress, with alleged record destruction adding to what he called a fracture in public trust.

What is the pardon question Paul raised?

Paul flagged the legal question of whether Biden's pardon grants Fauci complete immunity from prosecution, a matter he said courts may need to resolve.

Had Paul expected Fauci to invoke the Fifth Amendment?

No; before the hearing Paul's staff was confident Fauci would not invoke the Fifth, and committee members were told to come prepared with questions, but that confidence proved misplaced.