ENERGYiPad Air M3 1TB cuts to $749 at Best Buy, erasing 40% of its sticker after Apple's price hikesJul 28, 2026
$ETHBitmine adds nearly 10,000 ETH to treasury, cumulative buybacks hit 11.6 million shares under $4 billion programJul 28, 2026
MACROSK Hynix shares deepen slide to 12% as selling pressure holdsJul 28, 2026
MACROSingapore birth rate hits post-independence lowJul 28, 2026
EARNINGSAI bond stress widens as Meta, Microsoft earnings approachJul 28, 2026
MACRONasdaq futures fall 0.5%, S&P 500 futures slip in pre-market tradeJul 28, 2026
ENERGYOver 1,000 Iran sanctions in place; Treasury pressure rated above bombs by U.S. officialsJul 28, 2026
ENERGY70% of U.S. voters oppose local data centers, Fox News poll findsJul 27, 2026
ENERGYiPad Air M3 1TB cuts to $749 at Best Buy, erasing 40% of its sticker after Apple's price hikesJul 28, 2026
$ETHBitmine adds nearly 10,000 ETH to treasury, cumulative buybacks hit 11.6 million shares under $4 billion programJul 28, 2026
MACROSK Hynix shares deepen slide to 12% as selling pressure holdsJul 28, 2026
MACROSingapore birth rate hits post-independence lowJul 28, 2026
EARNINGSAI bond stress widens as Meta, Microsoft earnings approachJul 28, 2026
MACRONasdaq futures fall 0.5%, S&P 500 futures slip in pre-market tradeJul 28, 2026
ENERGYOver 1,000 Iran sanctions in place; Treasury pressure rated above bombs by U.S. officialsJul 28, 2026
ENERGY70% of U.S. voters oppose local data centers, Fox News poll findsJul 27, 2026

Ethereum, Solana and Avalanche got busier and cheaper while token prices fell more than 50% YoY, Bitwise reports

A more than 50% year-over-year price decline hit $ETH, $SOL and $AVAX in unison, according to Bitwise. Activity climbed on all three networks over the same period, and fees fell. Activity up, fees down, revenues down: the math reconciles…

By Sofia Almeida·Jul 27, 2026·1 min read·crypto·$AVAX · $ETH · $SOL

A more than 50% year-over-year price decline hit $ETH, $SOL and $AVAX in unison, according to Bitwise. Activity climbed on all three networks over the same period, and fees fell. Activity up, fees down, revenues down: the math reconciles because fee compression outran transaction growth.

The fee-compression dynamic

When per-transaction costs fall fast enough, total revenue contracts even if transaction counts rise. That is the arithmetic Bitwise describes across Ethereum, Solana and Avalanche during the reported period. Cheaper networks benefit users directly. Lower fees reduce transaction costs and can expand the range of economically viable on-chain activity. The cost shows up on the revenue line, where the same volume produces less income when unit fees are lower.

What the source does not specify is the size of either move. No transaction figures, no revenue totals, and no specific fee levels appear in the Bitwise summary. The direction of each variable is clear; the magnitude is not reported here.

Token price versus on-chain activity

All three tokens are down more than 50% on a year-over-year basis, per Bitwise. The report frames those price declines alongside the busier, cheaper network conditions, a pairing that separates token-market performance from network-level usage.

Higher activity with falling revenue and falling prices means the three metrics moved in different directions over the period. Token prices and revenues contracted together. Activity climbed against them. Bitwise presents the combination as a single data set: networks that are more active and cheaper to use, carrying tokens that have lost more than half their value against where they sat a year ago.

Related reading

Share
Source: NewsMeter
© 2026 NewsMeter

Key takeaways

Frequently asked

Which tokens fell more than 50% year-over-year according to Bitwise?

Ethereum's $ETH, Solana's $SOL and Avalanche's $AVAX each declined more than 50% on a year-over-year basis.

How can activity rise while revenue falls?

Fee compression outran transaction growth, so when per-transaction costs fall fast enough, total revenue contracts even as transaction counts rise.

Does the Bitwise summary give specific numbers for the changes?

No; it reports the direction of each variable but does not provide transaction figures, revenue totals, or specific fee levels.

Who benefits from the lower fees?

Users benefit directly, since lower fees reduce transaction costs and can expand the range of economically viable on-chain activity.

What does the pairing of falling prices and busier networks show?

It separates token-market performance from network-level usage, indicating token prices and revenues fell while on-chain activity climbed.